Sunday, August 3, 2014

CORRUPTION


by Peter Paul D. Eting

There is no doubt that Philippines is better now in some aspects, as I observed government is very sincere of fighting the corrupt practices in different agencies, in fact there are many high profile figure were sent to Jail or some have been removed to their offices, others are forced to resigned from their position. This is good news for the Filipino people especially to the next generation, who are anticipating better future and job in their adulthood.
Political analyst said that corruption can be a practice in any agency of any organization and it is impossible to stop it, but at least we still have hope, there are still peo
ple who are concern of their nation more than anything else, one of my professors said that the reason our nation is struggling is because of lack of patriotism, we are tend to be self-centred person and no time for other issues in government, our concern is only for our self and family, earnings and business.



Today our Philippines is facing a lot of problems, the successive natural and manmade calamities leave plenty of damages and counting years to recover, but gratefully for the international communities helping us to recover from devastating effect of our nation and people.
One of the trending issue today in the Philippines is the corruption of the lawmakers, they called it the Priority Development assistance Fund  (PDAF) this money is from the tax of people which is in the hands of the government, for the purpose of development in the different areas of the Philippines, it covers agriculture, livelihood, infrastructure projects for the benefits of the common people, the intention is very good but what makes it problematic, the people who are given the authority to implement this program was blinded by their personal interest, this private and public officials are having a manipulation of that money and this money was only went to the pocket of few individuals, this is violation of the Law and there is moral accountability to the life of people and the Nation.

The latest is the collision of the two branches of the government, when the Supreme Court declared that part Disbursement Accelerated Program (DAP) is unconstitutional. This DAP is created by the executive branch to have authority to spend the “savings” of the government for immediate needs of the people in times of  calamities and other unexpected disasters. The Supreme Court said that the congress has only the authority to declare budget based on their approval, the executive is the implementing body, the executive said they did nothing wrong because they use it for good of people (Yolanda victims), the Supreme Court answered that they are not saying that spending it is wrong but the way it was done was wrong process. Many people asked if it is moral to use the money without the approval of the congress. The executive says it is also moral if we will wait something happen before we take action during calamity relief operations? Others said that this is another way of pocketing the money of people? I am grateful to learn from your opinion, please give your comment.



Questions:
What do you think of the position of the Executive judiciary branch?
Did the Supreme Court fail to exercise their moral judgements?


                



Resources: (From my reading and watching)

ABS CBN news TV.
 PHILIPPINE DAILY INQUIRER



        


1 comment:

  1. First of all, I would like to appreciate it if more info and direct link were given here. But anyway, I was one of those who protested against corruption during the "Million People March" last year. I specifically chose the word "corruption" here because that is what I am really against. The PDAF and DAP are not evil laws. However, the misuse of them becomes the act of corruption.

    The executive and judiciary branch of our government are facing moral dilemmas. I could not accuse them at once of doing moral judgments. The reason for this is because, if and only if DAP and PDAF are constitutional, and they in their pure nature do not contradict any Scriptural principle (this has to be written for those who would like to include religious discussions), then they are not evils.

    I could only accuse both branches of the government of lack of moral judgment if they are only using these issues public to sway people from more crucial issues and if they know exactly what to do constitutionally yet intentionally violated their moral conscience or became apathetic in enforcing righteousness and professionalism in their work, for this matter.

    As of this point, I decide to only go this far with my comment on this issue, as posted in this blog.

    ReplyDelete